Skip to main content

Supreme Court lets Trump ban on most refugees stand

Supreme Court lets Trump ban on most refugees stand


The justices said in June that the administration could not enforce the bans against people who have a "bona fide" relationship with people or entities in the United States. | Getty

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to maintain its restrictive policy on refugees.

The justices on Tuesday agreed to an administration request to block a lower court ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October.

The order was not the court s last word on the travel policy that President Donald Trump first rolled out in January. The justices are scheduled to hear arguments on Oct. 10 on the legality of the bans on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries and refugees anywhere in the world.

It s unclear, though, what will be left for the court to decide. The 90-day travel ban lapses in late September and the 120-day refugee ban will expire a month later.

The administration has yet to say whether it will seek to renew the bans, make them permanent or expand the travel ban to other countries.

Lower courts have ruled that the bans violate the Constitution and federal immigration law. The high court has agreed to review those rulings. Its intervention so far has been to evaluate what parts of the policy can take effect in the meantime.

The justices said in June that the administration could not enforce the bans against people who have a "bona fide" relationship with people or entities in the United States. The justices declined to define the required relationships more precisely.

A panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district judge s order that would have allowed refugees to enter the United States if a resettlement agency in the U.S. had agreed to take them in.

The administration objected, saying the relationship between refugees and resettlement agencies shouldn t count. The high court s unsigned, one-sentence order agreed with the administration, at least for now.

The appeals court also upheld another part of the judge s ruling that applies to the ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Grandparents and cousins of people already in the U.S. can t be excluded from the country under the travel ban, as the Trump administration had wanted. The administration did not ask the Supreme Court to block that part of the ruling.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

30 Harrowing Pictures From The 9/11 Terrorist Attacks

On the 16th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, these are the pictures that are forever seared into our memories and hearts. Warning: Some images may be disturbing. Warning This image is graphic Tap to reveal Click to reveal

The Other Stephen King Adaptations We Should Be Talking About

Gerald’s Game and 1922 are not the next It , but they’re solid reminders of how effective Stephen King’s smaller, more confined storytelling can be in the hands of deft filmmakers. You could call 2017 the year of Stephen King if Stephen King had ever really gone out of style. But it’s true: We’ve seen an abundance of King adaptations over the last several months, from forgettable trainwrecks like The Dark Tower in July to the record-breaking success of It just this month. Then there are the TV series — Spike’s The Mist and Audience’s Mr. Mercedes , as well as Hulu’s Castle Rock , which is currently filming. With so much going on in the world of King, it’s easy to miss something — such as the two motion picture adaptations hitting Netflix this fall. Arriving on Netflix this Friday is Gerald’s Game , based on King’s 1992 novel, a psychosexual thriller about BDSM roleplay gone very wrong. Then there’s 1922 , which debuts on Netflix on Oct. 20; i...

Live Watch discussion Tonight! ?? Louder with Crowder undercover in Antifa with Ben Shapiro. Watch and discuss.